By Shwan Zulal
Tension between Baghdad and Kurdistan region has reached its peak since
the Iraqi PM, Nuri AL-Maliki ordered the removal of Kurdish flags from
government buildings in Khanaqin in Diyala province, which is in the disputed
territories defined under Article 140 of the Iraqi constitution.
![]() |
| Demonstrations in Kurdistan Region |
Since the directive was issues by the Iraqi PM, many protests in Diyala
province and elsewhere in Kurdistan region have taken place. The demonstrations
were highly charged with nationalistic slogans and even one protester is
reported to have set himself alight. The head of Diyala province also refused
to comply with the order from the PM to remove the Kurdish flag from government
buildings.
The focal point of the incident was in Khanaqin, in an area which has
been the subject of ethnic cleansing and arabization for decades by the former
regime. The Iraqi PM's latest decision to remove Kurdish flags has evoked
painful memories from the past, and brought the simmering ethnic disputes and
mistrust to the surface.
Maliki's directive is seen as a symbolic move by Baghdad to assert
control over the areas, which is still disputed and successive Iraqi government
after 2003 failed to deal with it. Kurds does not see areas like
Khanaqin as a disputed territory but as part of Kurdistan region, which is
waiting to be annexed back to the region if and when the long-awaited article
140 of the Iraqi constitution is implemented.
It is needless to say that areas like Khanaqin and Kirkuk which falls
under the "disputed territories" are strategically very important for
whoever controls it, because it has abundant hydrocarbon
reserves and Kirkuk has one of the largest giant oil filed in Iraq.
Resentments and tit for tat politics are on the increase between the
central government and the KRG (Kurdistan Regional government). Oil output from
Kurdistan region is decreasing as payment issues is still not being resolved.
Companies like DNO international ASA and others operating in the region
have been pumping oil to the northern Iraqi pipelines and they have been
increasing their output in the last year after an agreement was reached to be
paid the cost by the Iraqi government. However, after a couple of payments, the
central government reneged on its undertaking and no further payments
being made since September and oil export from Kurdistan through Iraq has
slowly but surely fallen.
It has been reported that the fall in production is due to
technical glitches but it is odd that as soon as payments stopped from the
central government the productions has withered away. Moreover, DNO
announced on Monday that it has reached a deal to supply the domestic market in
tune of 675000 barrel of oil at the rate of 10.000 bopd at $50, and made it
clear that it will receive payments in advance.
Although DNO has said that it has had a go-ahead from the authorities,
it is not clear if this has been cleared with the central government.
Furthermore, it remains to be seen if the revenue generated by this deal would
be taken into account when Baghdad allocate KRG budget.
It is a known fact that Iraq and Kurdistan has a deficit in refining
capacity and Turkmenistan's surplus refining capacity along with Turkey and
other neighbouring nations has been used to supply the domestic market.
Many oil companies in Kurdistan region are reaching the final stages of
their initial exploration programs and are in a position to start selling oil
to create a revenue stream in order to continue their programs and balance
their books. However, limited access to the much-need funds and obstruction by
Baghdad will not make it easy for them and compel them to find other ways to
sell their oil.
DNO has been one of the early entrants to region and has made an early
move to switch to local market, which means trucking the oil rather than
sending it through the central government's pipelines.
What is happening in Kurdistan oil market feels as if the region is
under a sanction imposed by Baghdad that laves KRG no choice but to improvise
and sell the oil to alternative markets.
The indiscretion by the Iraqi government towards Kurdistan region is
alienating the Kurds further. The battle over the control of the oil
and revenue sharing is one which will determine the shape of Iraq and the level
of Kurdish independence from central government, but tactics deployed by
Maliki's government is pushing the parties further apart.
Unless the Iraqi government change its stance and wake up to the fact
that Kurdistan region is not willing submit to central government's authority
like before, the KRG would find other ways to sell the oil and generate a revenue
stream. Meanwhile, KRG will continue demanding its 17 per cent of the overall
Iraqi budget, which is entitled to under the Iraqi constitution. Iraq depends
on oil for 95 per cent of its income and as the disputes escalates and KRG
redirect its oil supplies, the rest of Iraq will be the net loser as a direct
consequences of Al-Maliki's governments polices.
